Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 584
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 123-128  

Toxoplasmosis in organ transplant recipients: Evaluation, implication, and prevention

Department of Medical Parasitology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Date of Acceptance16-Jul-2016
Date of Web Publication19-Sep-2016

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sumeeta Khurana
Department of Medical Parasitology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh - 160 012
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/2229-5070.190814

Rights and Permissions

Toxoplasmosis in organ transplant patients can be a result of donor-transmitted infection, or reactivation of latent infection, or de novo infection. Solid organ transplants including heart, liver, kidney, pancreas and small bowel, and hematogenous stem cell transplants have been implicated in the risk of acquiring infection. In contrast to a benign course in immunocompetent individuals, the spectrum of illness is severe in transplant recipients. Clinical manifestations usually occur within the first 3 months of transplant and may present as encephalitis, pneumonitis, chorioretinitis, meningitis, and disseminated toxoplasmosis with multi-organ involvement. The diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in organ transplant patients is often difficult and is an integration of clinical, radiological, and microbiological workup. Preventive measures include pretransplant evaluation and chemoprophylaxis in view of rapidly progressing and fatal outcome of toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised individuals.

Keywords: Parasite, solid organ transplant, stem cell transplant, toxoplasmosis, transplant

How to cite this article:
Khurana S, Batra N. Toxoplasmosis in organ transplant recipients: Evaluation, implication, and prevention. Trop Parasitol 2016;6:123-8

How to cite this URL:
Khurana S, Batra N. Toxoplasmosis in organ transplant recipients: Evaluation, implication, and prevention. Trop Parasitol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2022 Nov 26];6:123-8. Available from: https://www.tropicalparasitology.org/text.asp?2016/6/2/123/190814

   Introduction Top

Toxoplasma, a protozoan parasite, an opportunist in immunodeficient individuals, exhibits a worldwide prevalence having infected 10-80% of the general population. [1] The prevalence of toxoplasma infection in India is reported to vary from 4.7-22% in North India to 37.3% in South India. [2],[3],[4] The course of infection is generally benign and most infected individuals remain asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic. However, the infection can cause significant morbidity and mortality in developing fetus if the infection is acquired during pregnancy. Furthermore, a well-established relationship exists between the severity of toxoplasmosis and level of immunosuppression. [5] Immunocompromised individuals include patients with hematologic malignancies, especially Hodgkin's disease and other lymphomas, AIDS patients, and patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy with cytotoxic drugs or corticosteroids or patients with organ transplants. Reactivation of latent disease due to a mismatch between the seropositive organ donor and seronegative recipient (D + /R ) or de novo infection is responsible for the transmission of disease. [6] Solid organ transplants (SOTs) including heart, liver, kidney, pancreas and small bowel, and bone marrow transplants have been implicated in the risk of acquiring infection. [6],[7] Varied presentations include encephalitis, pneumonitis, chorioretinitis, meningitis, and disseminated toxoplasmosis with multi-organ involvement as opposed to the self-limiting spectrum in immunocompetent individuals. In today's scenario, with the increase in number of organ transplant surgeries, this review provides an insight into the evaluation, implication, and prevention of toxoplasmosis.

   Solid Organ Transplants Top

Presenting within the first 3 months posttransplant, toxoplasmosis as an infectious complication in SOT is a well-recognized entity. [6] In contrast to hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), graft transmission is a more common mechanism than reactivation in SOT. [6] However, when disease occurs >3-6 months after SOT, it is more likely due to reactivation, or de novo disease following immunosuppressive therapy given when rejection is anticipated or suspected. The transmission of infection from a seropositive donor having acquired infection in the past to a seronegative recipient (D + /R ) is maximum after heart transplant (50-75%), followed by liver (20%) and renal (<1%) transplants, in the absence of prophylaxis. [7] During posttransplant-induced immunosuppression, the encysted bradyzoites from donor or recipient transform into proliferating tachyzoites that destroy the infected cells. In the case of seronegative recipients, the infection becomes disseminated in the absence of preexisting antitoxoplasma immunity. For pretransplant seropositive recipients, reactivation of latent infection is rare and less severe than donor-transmitted infection. Data from retrospective studies show the incidence to vary between 9% and 56%, being governed by factors such as the prevalence of infection in the region, and the use and response to chemoprophylaxis. [5],[6],[8],[9],[10],[11] Studies from various countries have reported the varying prevalence of organ-transmitted and reactivated toxoplasmosis in heart and heart-lung recipients. Montoya et al. 2001 reported the prevalence of clinical toxoplasmosis in the United States via organ transmission to be 12.5% in seronegative recipients and 25% in patients without prophylaxis. [9] Toxoplasmic disease and disseminated aspergillosis were associated with highest mortality rates attributable to an infectious complication in heart transplant recipients. [9] From another heart transplant center, Luft et al. observed the prevalence to be 75%. [10] In Switzerland, Gallino et al. reported a prevalence of 16.7% while Wreghitt et al. in the United Kingdom found it to be 28.5% in patients on chemoprophylaxis and 57% in patients without prophylaxis. [11],[12] A few studies on reactivation in seropositive recipients report the serological prevalence to vary between 4% and 53% but with very few cases presenting clinically. [9],[10],[11],[12] After noncardiac SOT, nonimmunized recipients have the propensity to acquire infection after transplants of kidney, liver, pancreas, and small bowel. [13] Campbell et al. 2006 reviewed 52 toxoplasma cases after noncardiac SOT reported in literature over a period of 40 years. The cases were maximum after the transplantation of kidney (34), liver (12), multi-organ (4) pancreas, and small bowel (1 each). Most cases were donor-transmitted (42%) which also had a higher rate of dissemination and fatality. [14] Hence, the inference that can be drawn from the above data is that the number of cases after noncardiac SOT is much less as compared to cardiac SOT.

The type of immunotherapy used after transplant also affects the risk predisposition and progression of the disease. The main treatment modalities for acute T cell-mediated rejection that includes antithymocyte globulin, OKT3, and corticosteroids increase the risk of opportunistic parasitic infections including toxoplasmosis. Furthermore, many drugs used during induction such as alemtuzumab also increase the same risk. [6]

   Hematogenous Stem Cell Transplants Top

The risk predisposition for toxoplasmosis is more in HSCT because of the greater duration of immunosuppression as compared to SOT. The risk is particularly high, 2-4 months posttransplant. Only <10% cases occur before 1 month and 15-20% cases occur after 100 days. [15] Reactivation of latent infection is a more common mechanism than donor-transmitted infection, with allogeneic stem cell transplants more predisposed as compared to autologous stem cell transplant. [15],[16] Cord blood transplantation, associated with a higher degree of immunosuppression, has been shown to be at the highest risk. [16] The prevalence of toxoplasmosis is reported to be 0.2-5.7% in toxoplasma seropositive transplant recipients from various parts of the world. [15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21] Thus, the toxoplasma seropositive status of the recipient is the main risk factor though it has been reported that the risk increases further if the donor is seronegative while the recipient is seropositive (D /R + ).

[Table 1] summarizes the risk factors for acquiring infection in transplant recipients.
Table 1: Toxoplasma serostatus and risk of toxoplasmosis in transplant recipients

Click here to view

   Clinical Presentation Top

In immunocompetent individuals, in more than 80% of cases, there is an asymptomatic infection. [22] In the remaining cases, fever, cervical lymphadenopathy, myalgia, and other nonspecific clinical symptoms are present. This is in stark contrast to the presentation in immunosuppressed individuals. The time of presentation in SOT recipients can be as early as 2 weeks posttransplant but with a usual presentation in the first 3 months. [6],[7] The severity of clinical features depends on the degree of immunosuppression induced and timing of appropriate antitoxoplasma therapy. Initially, symptoms can be nonspecific with fever, respiratory or neurological features. Central nervous system manifestation occurs in 10-25% of transplant recipients with toxoplasmosis and encephalitis is the usual presentation. Severe manifestations include myocarditis, encephalitis, pneumonitis, or multi-organ involvement. Pulmonary involvement is usually bilateral and presents as interstitial pneumonitis. [23],[24] Toxoplasmosis in heart transplant recipients may simulate organ rejection in which disseminated disease may occur if immunosuppression is intensified. [25] The fatality rate in disseminated disease is >80%. In HSCTs, the most common presentation is brain abscess presenting within first 2 months of transplant. In <10% cases, the patients present within <30 days and 15-20%, later than 100 days. [15]

   Evaluation Top

The diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in organ transplant patients is often difficult and is an integration of clinical, radiological, and microbiological workup. Clinically, the patient presents with nonspecific signs and symptoms, with various differentials which need to be ruled out. Computerized tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging can provide suggestive pointers to diagnosis. Radiological imaging of the brain showing focal single or multiple contrast-enhancing lesions with surrounding edema or sometimes diffuse lesions points toward encephalitis. Alveolar consolidation with interstitial pneumonitis can be well appreciated in pulmonary toxoplasmosis. However, a definitive diagnosis of infection necessitates the identification of parasites. When myocarditis presents in cardiac transplant recipients, endomyocardial biopsy is crucial in differentiating infection from rejection. As the presentation of toxoplasmosis in organ recipients is usually in the form of a multi-organ involvement, microscopy of a Giemsa-stained smear of blood, body fluids such as cerebrospinal fluid, bronchoalveolar lavage, bone marrow, and other tissue samples would help in identification of tachyzoites. [7],[15],[17] However, the low sensitivity of microscopy makes use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting repeated B1 and AF146527 genes a more favorable option. [24] A positive PCR in whole blood with a clinical evidence of multi-organ involvement means the presence of active disease. Real-time PCR helps in measuring the parasite load which helps in the monitoring and progression of the disease and a negative PCR can help rule out the disease. [15] It has been reported that real-time PCR can detect the disease before the onset of clinical manifestations. [15] The other techniques for demonstration of parasite include mouse inoculation and cell culture technique; however, the disadvantage is the longer time to diagnosis, at least 4 weeks for mouse inoculation and 1-2 weeks for cell culture. Serology can be helpful in differentiation of graft-transmitted and reactivation toxoplasmosis. Seroconversion with presence of IgM and IgG antibody titers is an indication toward an acquired infection whereas the presence of IgG antibody titers with a high avidity index alone in the absence of IgM titers suggests reactivation. The disadvantage of serological diagnostic techniques is the absence of seroconversion in some cases because of profound immunosuppression. In HSCT recipients, a transient rise in IgG antibodies may occur due to passive antibody transmission via graft or blood transfusions. [Table 2] categorizes the patients after HSCT into definite, probable, and possible toxoplasmosis as defined by the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation in the year 2000. [15]
Table 2: The Infectious Diseases Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation definitions for toxoplasmosis after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (adapted from Martino et al., 2000)

Click here to view

   Prevention Top

Preventive measures include pretransplant evaluation which involves screening of both organ donor and recipient for various tropical infections, so that appropriate measures to eradicate the infection can be taken if possible, or else to start suitable chemoprophylaxis to patients at higher risk of reactivation disease. Serological tests performed for the toxoplasma antibody status of both donor and recipient can help prevent infection by taking appropriate measures in the form of primary prevention, i.e., hygienic precautions, or secondary prevention in the form of chemoprophylaxis. Varying incidence rates of toxoplasmosis among various countries govern the decision of screening. In Europe, of 29 countries included in the Eurotransplant network, toxoplasma serology is mandatory as a pretransplant evaluation modality in 11 countries. [25] In France, all patients are screened before transplantation, in contrast to the United States where it largely depends on the transplant center. [26] Posttransplant, serological follow-up is specifically useful in case of mismatched SOT recipients (D + /R ) since seroconversion indicates the transmission of Toxoplasma gondii. However, a rise in antibody titer in other SOT recipients as well as in HSCT is not of much significance. A more beneficial test would be a molecular test such as PCR which would be a confirmation of the presence of active disease. This would be helpful in patients not receiving prophylaxis.

   Chemoprophylaxis Top

Chemoprophylaxis is important in view of the rapidly progressing and fatal outcome of toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised individuals. An ideal drug should be useful for eradication of cysts. Atovaquone has been tried in mice models, but its efficacy in humans still needs to be validated. Dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors, sulfonamides, are drugs active against the replicative stages (tachyzoites) proven both in vitro and in vivo. At present, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (160-800 mg) daily or thrice weekly has proven to be effective in SOT in mismatched patients. [27] Pyrimethamine (25 mg/day) alone can be given as an alternative in case of intolerance to sulfa drugs. [27] Furthermore, in cardiac transplants, pyrimethamine alone has been proposed for prophylaxis.

For bone marrow transplants, all seropositive recipients should be given prophylaxis. As for SOT, co-trimoxazole daily or thrice weekly is the preferred drug; however, in some European HSCT centers, pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine is preferred as it can be administered weekly. [25],[26],[27],[28],[29] The usage of a combination of clindamycin, pyrimethamine, and leucovorin has been proposed in co trimoxazole intolerant patients. There is no clear-cut guideline for initiation or duration of prophylaxis. While an early prophylaxis decreases the risk of toxoplasmosis, on the other hand, there is more chance of delayed engraftment due to the toxicity of drugs. Many centers administer prophylaxis from day −7 to −2 and restart on day +30 post-HSCT. [28] In case of delayed initiation of prophylaxis, PCR needs to be done weekly on blood samples in high-risk categories. A 6-month prophylactic treatment is recommended post-HSCT. [27] In seronegative recipients, hygienic measures should be taken so as to prevent attainment of infection by ingestion of undercooked meat or raw vegetables infected with oocysts. In case of a donor with recent acquisition of infection, pyrimethamine along with sulfadiazine should be given to the donor for treatment. Furthermore, at-risk recipient should be given prophylactic treatment following transplant. Some problems with prophylaxis are the few side effects with these drugs which include skin rashes, nephrotoxicity, and myelotoxicity, and the possibility of the emergence of drug-resistant parasites.

   Treatment Top

The first choice of treatment comprises pyrimethamine 200 mg PO once, followed by 50-75 mg PO QD depending on the body weight plus sulfadiazine 4-6 g/day in four divided doses plus folinic acid 10 mg PO QD. [30] The duration of treatment is up to 6 weeks till the time of resolution of symptoms. In case of ocular involvement, adjunctive therapy with prednisone 80-120 mg PO QD can be given. In case of patients allergic to sulfa drugs, the regimen chosen is pyrimethamine 200 mg PO once, then 50-75 mg PO QD plus folinic acid 10 mg PO QD plus either clindamycin 1.2-4.8 g/day intravenous or atovaquone 750 mg PO QD for 6 weeks. [30] The other alternative drugs include pyrimethamine and folinic acid as in the standard regimen plus one of the following: atovaquone (1500 mg q12h PO) or clarithromycin (500 mg q12h PO) or azithromycin (900-1200 mg QD PO) or dapsone (100 mg PO QD). [30]

   Conclusion Top

Toxoplasmosis in immunosuppression is a serious entity with a fatal outcome. With advancing technology, the organ transplant number is on the rise. Like in other infections such as HIV, cytomegalovirus, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus, it is of utmost importance to evaluate the status of both the donor and recipient. More than 50-75% infections in transplant recipients are the result of lack of prophylaxis. Thus, it becomes essential to implement preventive measures and keep a high index of clinical suspicion. A combination of serological screening and chemoprophylaxis can help combat the disease. A serological and PCR follow-up of high-risk patients will help in timely detection of the disease and ultimately better outcome.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

   References Top

Pappas G, Roussos N, Falagas ME. Toxoplasmosis snapshots: Global status of Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence and implications for pregnancy and congenital toxoplasmosis. Int J Parasitol 2009;39:1385-94.  Back to cited text no. 1
Mohan B, Dubey ML, Malla N, Kumar R. Seroepidemiological study of toxoplasmosis in different sections of population of Union Territory of Chandigarh. J Commun Dis 2002;34:15-22.  Back to cited text no. 2
Dhumne M, Sengupta C, Kadival G, Rathinaswamy A, Velumani A. National seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in India. J Parasitol 2007;93:1520-1.  Back to cited text no. 3
Khurana S, Bagga R, Aggarwal A, Lyngdoh V, Shivapriya, Diddi K, et al. Serological screening for antenatal toxoplasma infection in India. Indian J Med Microbiol 2010;28:143-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
Robert-Gangneux F, Dardé ML. Epidemiology of and diagnostic strategies for toxoplasmosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2012;25:264-96.  Back to cited text no. 5
Coster LO. Parasitic infections in solid organ transplant recipients. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2013;27:395-427.  Back to cited text no. 6
Schaffner A. Pretransplant evaluation for infections in donors and recipients of solid organs. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33 Suppl 1:S9-14.  Back to cited text no. 7
Fernàndez-Sabé N, Cervera C, Fariñas MC, Bodro M, Muñoz P, Gurguí M, et al. Risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes of toxoplasmosis in solid-organ transplant recipients: A matched case-control study. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54:355-61.  Back to cited text no. 8
Montoya JG, Giraldo LF, Efron B, Stinson EB, Gamberg P, Hunt S, et al. Infectious complications among 620 consecutive heart transplant patients at Stanford University Medical Center. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33:629-40.  Back to cited text no. 9
Luft BJ, Naot Y, Araujo FG, Stinson EB, Remington JS. Primary and reactivated toxoplasma infection in patients with cardiac transplants. Clinical spectrum and problems in diagnosis in a defined population. Ann Intern Med 1983;99:27-31.  Back to cited text no. 10
Gallino A, Maggiorini M, Kiowski W, Martin X, Wunderli W, Schneider J, et al. Toxoplasmosis in heart transplant recipients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1996;15:389-93.  Back to cited text no. 11
Wreghitt TG, Hakim M, Gray JJ, Balfour AH, Stovin PG, Stewart S, et al. Toxoplasmosis in heart and heart and lung transplant recipients. J Clin Pathol 1989;42:194-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
Hommann M, Schotte U, Voigt R, Glutig H, Grube T, Küpper B, et al. Cerebral toxoplasmosis after combined liver-pancreas-kidney and liver-pancreas transplantation. Transplant Proc 2002;34:2294-5.  Back to cited text no. 13
Campbell AL, Goldberg CL, Magid MS, Gondolesi G, Rumbo C, Herold BC. First case of toxoplasmosis following small bowel transplantation and systematic review of tissue-invasive toxoplasmosis following noncardiac solid organ transplantation. Transplantation 2006;81:408-17.  Back to cited text no. 14
Martino R, Maertens J, Bretagne S, Rovira M, Deconinck E, Ullmann AJ, et al. Toxoplasmosis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31:1188-95.  Back to cited text no. 15
Matsuo Y, Takeishi S, Miyamoto T, Nonami A, Kikushige Y, Kunisaki Y, et al. Toxoplasmosis encephalitis following severe graft-vs.-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: 17 yr experience in Fukuoka BMT group. Eur J Haematol 2007;79:317-21.  Back to cited text no. 16
Slavin MA, Meyers JD, Remington JS, Hackman RC. Toxoplasma gondii infection in marrow transplant recipients: A 20 year experience. Bone Marrow Transplant 1994;13:549-57.  Back to cited text no. 17
de Medeiros BC, de Medeiros CR, Werner B, Loddo G, Pasquini R, Bleggi-Torres LF. Disseminated toxoplasmosis after bone marrow transplantation: Report of 9 cases. Transpl Infect Dis 2001;3:24-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
Derouin F, Devergie A, Auber P, Gluckman E, Beauvais B, Garin YJ, et al. Toxoplasmosis in bone marrow-transplant recipients: Report of seven cases and review. Clin Infect Dis 1992;15:267-70.  Back to cited text no. 19
Janitschke K, Held T, Krüiger D, Schwerdtfeger R, Schlier G, Liesenfeld O. Diagnostic value of tests for Toxoplasma gondii-specific antibodies in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Clin Lab 2003;49:239-42.  Back to cited text no. 20
Martino R, Bretagne S, Einsele H, Maertens J, Ullmann AJ, Parody R, et al. Early detection of toxoplasma infection by molecular monitoring of Toxoplasma gondii in peripheral blood samples after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:67-78.  Back to cited text no. 21
Montoya JG, Liesenfeld O. Toxoplasmosis. Lancet 2004;363:1965-76.  Back to cited text no. 22
Muñoz P, Valerio M, Eworo A, Bouza E. Parasitic infections in solid-organ transplant recipients. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2011;16:565-75.  Back to cited text no. 23
Fricker-Hidalgo H, Bulabois CE, Brenier-Pinchart MP, Hamidfar R, Garban F, Brion JP, et al. Diagnosis of toxoplasmosis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: Results of DNA detection and serological techniques. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48:e9-15.  Back to cited text no. 24
European Commission. Directorate. Human Organ Transplantation in Europe; An Overview. Report from the General Health and Consumer Protection Public Health and Risk Assessment Directorate; 2003. p. 1-20. Available from: http://www.ec.europa.eu/health/ph_threats/human_substance/documents/organ_survey.pdf. [Last accessed on 2016 Jun 28].  Back to cited text no. 25
Sullivan KM, Dykewicz CA, Longworth DL, Boeckh M, Baden LR, Rubin RH, et al. Preventing opportunistic infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Infectious Diseases Society of America, and American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Practice Guidelines and beyond. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2001;1:392-421.  Back to cited text no. 26
Foot AB, Garin YJ, Ribaud P, Devergie A, Derouin F, Gluckman E. Prophylaxis of toxoplasmosis infection with pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine (Fansidar) in bone marrow transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 1994;14:241-5.  Back to cited text no. 27
Isa F, Saito K, Huang YT, Schuetz A, Babady NE, Salvatore S, et al. Implementation of molecular surveillance after a cluster of fatal toxoplasmosis at 2 neighboring transplant centers. Clin Infect Dis 2016. pii: Ciw330.  Back to cited text no. 28
Derouin F, Pelloux H; ESCMID Study Group on Clinical Parasitology. Prevention of toxoplasmosis in transplant patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 2008;14:1089-101.  Back to cited text no. 29
Montoya JG, Boothroyd J, Kovacs JA. Toxoplasma gondii. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 7 th ed. Philadelphia, USA: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2009. p. 3495-526.  Back to cited text no. 30


  [Table 1], [Table 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Isolated cerebral toxoplasmosis 17 years post renal transplant
Adrienne Cohen, Ella Sugo, Bobby Chacko
Transplant Infectious Disease. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Delayed Cerebral Toxoplasmosis in a Kidney Transplant Patient: a Case Report
Hosung Myeong, Moowan Park, Ji Eun Kim, Sun Won Park, Sang Hyung Lee
The Korean Journal of Parasitology. 2022; 60(1): 35
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Screening for the Detection of Toxoplasma gondii IgG, IgM and IgA in Females of Reproductive Age from Western Romania
Alin Gabriel Mihu, Maria Alina Lupu, Alexandru Nesiu, Daniela Teodora Marti, Tudor Rares Olariu
Life. 2022; 12(11): 1771
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Impact of Plant-Based Foods and Nutraceuticals on Toxoplasma gondii Cysts: Nutritional Therapy as a Viable Approach for Managing Chronic Brain Toxoplasmosis
Sijie Tan, Wen Han Tong, Ajai Vyas
Frontiers in Nutrition. 2022; 9
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Endemic parasitic disease - Expert group opinion for South Asia for solid-organ transplantation - Leishmaniasis, Malaria, Toxoplasmosis, Filariasis, and strongyloidiasis
Venkatasubramanian Ramasubramanian, Rajendran Surendran, Nitin Bansal, Sowmya Sridharan, Natarajan Gopalakrishnan, SubaGuru Prasad, Muhibur Rahman, ShyamBihri Bansal
Indian Journal of Transplantation. 2022; 16(5): 57
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Clinical characteristics and outcomes of toxoplasmosis among transplant recipients at two US academic medical centers
Ruth O. Adekunle,Amy Sherman,Jennifer O. Spicer,Julia A. Messina,Julie M. Steinbrink,Mary Elizabeth Sexton,George Marshall Lyon,Aneesh K. Mehta,Varun K. Phadke,Michael H. Woodworth
Transplant Infectious Disease. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Stage-Specific Oligonucleotide Primers for the Diagnosis of Toxoplasmosis Among Iranian Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients; Evaluation of Cotrimoxazole as a Preventive Therapy
Mohammad Mahdavi,Abdoulreza Esteghamati,Khadijeh Khanaliha,Shirin Sayyahfar,Elahe Orang,Farah Bokharaei-Salim,Saba Garshasbi,Borna Salemi
Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 2021; In Press(In Press)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Imiquimod Targets Toxoplasmosis Through Modulating Host Toll-Like Receptor-MyD88 Signaling
Maguy Hamie,Rania Najm,Carine Deleuze-Masquefa,Pierre Antoine Bonnet,Jean-François Dubremetz,Marwan El Sabban,Hiba El Hajj
Frontiers in Immunology. 2021; 12
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder Presenting as Ptosis, Fever, and Regression of Milestones 7 Months After Liver Transplant
Alvaro Proaño,Elizabeth A. Margolis,Katherine L. Gandert,Mathew Fletcher,Rajasekharan P. Warrier
Clinical Pediatrics. 2021; 60(1): 75
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Acute Liver Failure Due to Toxoplasmosis After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation
Nicholas Baldwin, Meagan Gray, Chirag R. Patel, Sameer Al Diffalha
Journal of Investigative Medicine High Impact Case Reports. 2021; 9: 2324709621
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Laboratory markers of toxoplasmosis in heart recipients
Evgeniya V. Abbazova, Dmitriy B. Goncharov, Elvira A. Domonova, Olga Yu. Silveystrova, Vasilisa A. Kovaleva, Irina V. Titova, Vyacheslav M. Zakharevich, Viktoriya G. Kormilitsyna, Ilhomhodzha I. Muminov, Nadezhda N. Koloskova, Timur A. Khalilulin, Nina I. Gabrielyan
Medical Journal of the Russian Federation. 2021; 27(3): 237
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Toxoplasma gondii in Australian macropods (Macropodidae) and its implication to meat consumption
Yannick Borkens
International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife. 2021; 16: 153
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Toxoplasma gondii infections in birds, companion, food and recreational animals in Nigeria: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Solomon Ngutor Karshima,Magdalene Nguvan Karshima,Gloria Pisha Karaye,Stanley David Oziegbe
Veterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and Reports. 2020; 21: 100418
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Serological diagnosis ofToxoplasma gondii: analysis of false-positive IgG results and implications
Loïc Simon,Judith Fillaux,Aurélie Guigon,Rose-Anne Lavergne,Odile Villard,Isabelle Villena,Pierre Marty,Christelle Pomares
Parasite. 2020; 27: 7
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Emerging and neglected zoonoses in transplant population
Anna Mrzljak,Rafaela Novak,Nenad Pandak,Irena Tabain,Lucija Franusic,Ljubo Barbic,Maja Bogdanic,Vladimir Savic,Danko Mikulic,Jadranka Pavicic-Saric,Vladimir Stevanovic,Tatjana Vilibic-Cavlek
World Journal of Transplantation. 2020; 10(3): 47
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
16 Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Cognitive Impairment and Neurodegeneration by Toxoplasma gondii Infection
Gloria Ortiz-Guerrero,Rodrigo E. Gonzalez-Reyes,Alejandra de-la-Torre,German Medina-Rincón,Mauricio O. Nava-Mesa
Brain Sciences. 2020; 10(6): 369
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
17 Toxoplasma gondii Monitoring in Liver Transplantation Patients: A Single Center Cross-Sectional Study in an Italian Hospital
Barbara Pinto,Federica Lotti,Stefania Petruccelli,Paola Carrai,Paolo De Simone,Fabrizio Bruschi
Pathogens. 2020; 9(5): 354
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 The Immunogenic and Immunoprotective Activities of Recombinant Chimeric T. gondii Proteins Containing AMA1 Antigen Fragments
Justyna Gatkowska,Katarzyna Dzitko,Bartlomiej Tomasz Ferra,Lucyna Holec-Gasior,Malwina Kawka,Bozena Dziadek
Vaccines. 2020; 8(4): 724
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
19 IL-1R Regulates Disease Tolerance and Cachexia in Toxoplasma gondii Infection
Stephanie J. Melchor,Claire M. Saunders,Imani Sanders,Jessica A. Hatter,Kari A. Byrnes,Sheryl Coutermarsh-Ott,Sarah E. Ewald
The Journal of Immunology. 2020; 204(12): 3329
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
20 Seroprevalence of Toxoplasmosis at a Tertiary Care Centre in North India from 2004 to 2014
Abhishek Mewara,Shreya Singh,Sumeeta Khurana,Parakriti Gupta,Rakesh Sehgal
Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2019; 37(3): 351
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
21 Tick transmission of toxoplasmosis
Ruben R Ben-Harari
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy. 2019; 17(11): 911
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
22 Case of cerebral toxoplasmosis masquerading as high-grade glioma
Kathleen P. McKenzie,Winnifred M. Wong,Shane B. Patterson,Joseph H. McDermott,Narayana K. Swamy,Claire L. Hiles
Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery. 2019; 17: 57
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
23 Transmission of Toxoplasma gondii Infection Due to Bone Marrow Transplantation: Validation by an Experimental Model
Carolina Salomão Lopes,Tamires Lopes Silva,Julio Cesar Neves de Almeida,Lucas Vasconcelos Soares Costa,Tiago Wilson Patriarca Mineo,José Roberto Mineo
Frontiers in Medicine. 2019; 6
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
24 Serological and molecular screening of umbilical cord blood for Toxoplasma gondii infection
Eman F. Botein,Ahmad Darwish,Nora L. El-Tantawy,Rizk EL-baz,Mohamed I. Eid,Ali M Shaltot
Transplant Infectious Disease. 2019; : e13117
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
25 Approach to Transplant Infectious Diseases in the Emergency Department
Diana Zhong,Stephen Y. Liang
Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
26 TgDrpC, an atypical dynamin-related protein in Toxoplasma gondii, is associated with vesicular transport factors and parasite division
Irene Heredero-Bermejo,Joseph M. Varberg,Robert Charvat,Kylie Jacobs,Tamila Garbuz,William J. Sullivan,Gustavo Arrizabalaga
Molecular Microbiology. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
27 Management of toxoplasmosis in transplant recipients: an update
Céline Dard,Pierre Marty,Marie-Pierre Brenier-Pinchart,Cécile Garnaud,Hélène Fricker-Hidalgo,Hervé Pelloux,Christelle Pomares
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy. 2018; 16(6): 447
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
28 Mast cell activator compound 48/40 is not an effective adjuvant for UV-attenuated Toxoplasma gondii vaccine
Xi Li,Shengjie Chen,Shiguang Huang,Fangli Lu
Parasitology Research. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
29 In deep: cerebral toxoplasmosisRunning Head: Cerebral Toxoplasmosis in Immunocompromised Host
Melanie R.F. Greenway,Keith A. Sacco,M. Caroline Burton
The American Journal of Medicine. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
    Solid Organ Tran...
    Hematogenous Ste...
    Clinical Present...
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded24    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 29    

Recommend this journal