Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 964
Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 
     


 
 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 69-77  

Host-parasite interactions in infections due to Entamoeba histolytica: A tale of known and unknown


Department of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Submission18-Sep-2021
Date of Decision17-Nov-2021
Date of Acceptance07-Dec-2021
Date of Web Publication24-Nov-2022

Correspondence Address:
Tuhina Banerjee
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/tp.tp_81_21

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Entamoeba histolytica (E. histolytica) is an enteric microaerophilic protozoan parasite responsible for millions of cases worldwide. Majority of the infections due to E. histolytica remain asymptomatic; however, it can cause an array of symptoms ranging from devastating dysentery, colitis, and abscesses in different vital organs. The interactions between the E. histolytica and its host are a multifaceted chain of events rather than merely destruction and invasion. There are manifold decisive steps for the establishment of infections by E. histolytica which includes degradation of mucosal layer, adherence to the host epithelium, invasion into the host tissues, and dissemination to vital organs. It is widely hypothesized that, for establishment of infections, the interactions at the intestinal mucosa decides the fate of the disease. The delicate communications between the parasite, the host factors, and the associated bacterial microflora play a significant role in the pathogenesis of E histolytica. In this review, we summarize the interactions between the E. histolytica and it's host at the genetic and immunological interphases emphasizing the crucial role of microbiota in these interactions.

Keywords: Adherence, epithelial cells, haplotype, immunological responses, invasion, microbiota


How to cite this article:
Singh A, Banerjee T. Host-parasite interactions in infections due to Entamoeba histolytica: A tale of known and unknown. Trop Parasitol 2022;12:69-77

How to cite this URL:
Singh A, Banerjee T. Host-parasite interactions in infections due to Entamoeba histolytica: A tale of known and unknown. Trop Parasitol [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 7];12:69-77. Available from: https://www.tropicalparasitology.org/text.asp?2022/12/2/69/361958




   Introduction Top


According to the World Health Organisation, amoebiasis is a major health problem in developing nations.[1] Entamoeba histolytica (E. histolytica), an enteric dwelling protozoan parasite, is the causative agent of amoebiasis. Amoebiasis was primarily considered as the disease of the underdeveloped and developing nations. However, there has been increasing reports of infections due to E. histolytica in developed nations in particular groups such as travellers from endemic regions, homosexual males, and institutionalised individuals.[2],[3],[4],[5] There are 50 million cases of infections caused by E. histolytica per year leading to 100,000 deaths.[6] Individuals usually harbor the parasite in the lumen of the colon as a harmless commensal and become asymptomatic carriers. However, it can cause devastating dysentery, colitis, and abscesses in different vital organs.[7] E. histolytica invades the intestinal mucosa often forming the “flask-shaped” ulcers. The reason behind the sudden switch to the pathogenic phenotype in asymptomatic carriers, leading to the onset of the disease, remains largely unknown. In this context, there is increasing awareness about the complexity of the host-parasite interactions in cases of infections due to E. histolytica.[8] The interactions between the E. histolytica and its host is a complex chain of events rather than solely destruction and invasion. It has been hypothesized that for millions of Entamoeba infections each year, the interactions at the intestinal mucosa decides the fate of the disease susceptibility.[8] There are multiple crucial steps for the establishment of infections by this parasite including degradation and invasion of mucosal layer, adherence of the parasite to the host epithelium, invasion into the host tissues, and finally dissemination to other vital organs.[9] The subtle interactions between the parasite, the host factors, and the resident bacterial flora most likely play an important role in the pathogenesis. As the concepts on the several interactions of E. histolytica and the host are evolving, we tried to provide an update of these interactions at immunological and genetic interphases along with the role of bacterial flora in the disease onset and progression.


   Survey Methodology Top


Literature search was focused on published data about interactions of the host and E. histolytica at different phases and those of the parasite with the associated microflora. The relevant literature search was done using databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar. Key words “pathogenesis of Entamoeba” were used. Finally, “role of microflora in Entamoeba infections,” such as “host parasite interactions,” the screened articles were included as reference for this review.


   Events During Host Parasite Interactions Top


Ingestion of cysts through contaminated food or water marks the beginning of the infection due to E. histolytica. The cysts undergo excystation in the terminal ileum, leading to the release of the trophozoites. The different events during the interactions of the host with E. histolytica and the major molecules involved have been included in [Figure 1]. Several such interactions are encountered during entry of the cyst inside the host.
Figure 1: Events in host-parasite interactions with major molecules involved during infections due to E. histolytica infections. Gal/GalNAc lectin: Galactose/N-Acetyl D-galactosamine, EhCP: E. histolytica cysteine proteases, MMPs: Matrix Metalloproteinases)

Click here to view


Interactions at the mucus barrier

The first line of host defence in a colonic environment is the mucus layer. It covers the epithelial layer restricting entry of any harmful substances, commensal, and pathogenic bacteria. The main component of the mucus layer is a large protein, MUC2 mucin secreted by the goblet cells of small and large intestine.[10] For the establishment of the pathogenesis, E. histolytica binds to the mucus layer through galactose/N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (Gal/GalNAc) lectin to gain access to the epithelial cells.[11] Calcium ions (Ca+2) play crucial role in the binding of the ligands by Gal/GalNAc lectin. The mutant of the Ca+2 binding site had shown loss of red blood cells agglutination property of E. histolytica, thus confirming that the Ca+2 plays an important role in regulating some of the properties of Gal/GalNAc lectin.[12] In addition, it has been shown that Ca+2 is involved in different processes, leading to the host tissue invasion.[13],[14] E. histolytica also possesses a number of glycosides that can remove the branched polysaccharides from the mucin or the host cells.[15] These include α-d-glucosidase, β-d-galactosidase, α-N-acetyl-d-galactosaminidase, β-N-acetyl-d-glucosaminidase, and β-l-fucosidase. Among these, β-N-acetyl-d-glucosaminidase has a central role in degradation of the carbohydrates of mucin.[16] This scarcity of the free carbohydrate creates a competition with the commensal microflora which can be the potential reason for turning on the switch for the pathogenic nature of E. histolytica. As mucin is the biggest source of carbohydrate in the colonic environment, the degradation of the mucus layer is increased. In addition, β-amylase and E. histolytica cysteine protease (EhCP), EhCP5 have been known to play a critical role causing a breachin the mucus layer for the invasive trophozoites.[17],[18] After digestion of carbohydrates, cysteine proteases cause robust destruction of the protein backbone in mucin layer.[9] Lysine-glutamic acid rich protein 1 (KERP1) has also been known to play an important role in the adherence of the E. histolytica to the host through α-helical region.[19]

Intestinal epithelial cell responses

As the epithelial cells come in contact with the parasite, it produces different cytokines. Intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) generate a pro-inflammatory response by interleukin (IL)-1 β and IL-8, resulting in recruitment of the neutrophils.[11] E. histolytica also induces the IECs to release monocytes and other chemokines.[20] E. histolytica responds by producing the secreted products that inhibit chemotaxis and mobility of the monocytes. E. histolytica also possess homology with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor causing chemotaxis toward TNF-α.[21] These events cause reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and upregulation of the E. histolytica Gal/GalNAc lectin, further resulting in the penetration of E. histolytica in the IECs and entry into the lamina propria. Recently, it has been explored that dysregulation of the micro-RNA occurs in the epithelial colon cells during the E. histolytica infections. The upregulation of miR150, miR-525, miR-526b-5p, miR-615-5p, miR-643, and downregulation of miR-409-3p during the E. histolytica infections impacts the gene expression of many important pathways.[22] In addition, E. histolytica can also induce apoptosis in host cells through altering the miRNA regulating genes involved in the PI3K/AKT signalling pathway, lipid metabolism, and apoptosis.[23]

Changes in tight junction permeability

E. histolytica regulates the tight junction permeability by a number of different mechanisms. The change in the permeability leads to the water and electrolyte imbalance causing diarrheal disease. The degradation of the tight junctions, ZO1, and dephosphorylation of ZO2 has been related to the permeability changes in the tight junction.[24] Along with it, E. histolytica has been known to regulate the tight junction permeability using the prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). The PGE2 is capable of disrupting the transepithelial resistance, thus causing paracellular leakage of chloride ions in the lumen which in turn causes the water electrolyte imbalance in diarrheal diseases.[25]

Extra-intestinal invasion

The mortality due to infections by E. histolytica is mainly because of the extra-intestinal manifestations, among which amebic liver abscess (ALA) is the most common one.[26] The exact reason for invasion of the trophozoites to the extra-intestinal regions remains unknown. The parasite E. histolytica has cytopathic effects on a number of epithelial cells and immune cells. E. histolytica causes killing of host cells through contact dependent mechanism using Gal/GalNAc lectins.[8] After the degradation of the epithelial cells, E. histolytica navigates through the extracellular matrix for dissemination to the extra-intestinal sites. When E. histolytica propagates through extra-intestinal system, it takes a path similar to that of cancer metastasis.[27] The trophozoites require glycosidases and proteases for the basement membrane disintegration and entry into the circulation. The invading E. histolytica also secretes EhCPs, leading to the activation of the host matrix metallo proteinases (MMPs).[28] Human factors such as human MMPs are believed to play a role in the extracellular matrix exploitation.[29] However, it has been hypothesized that, instead of complete degradation, the parasite goes for the remodelling of the collagen to increase the porosity of the extracellular matrix for the invading trophozoites. Over expression of the MMPs has been reported in protozoan parasitic diseases including amebic colitis and recurrent cases of ALA.[30] E. histolytica has 22 genes encoding for the metalloproteinases.[31]

Infection in the liver is the interplay between the E. histolytica trophozoites and hepatic cells. As the E. histolytica trophozoite reaches the liver, it creates lesions of well-circumscribed area with dead hepatocytes, liquified cells, and cellular debris. The abscess is surrounded by connective tissues with inflammatory cells and trophozoites.[32] However, the host and parasitic factors leading to liver abscess formation largely remain undescribed.

Immunological responses during progression to invasive amoebiasis

The host recruits immune cells to the site of invasion which attack the parasite and enhance the pathology. The host cell also releases nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species (ROS) for damaging the invading trophozoites.[9],[33] However, E. histolytica has specific mechanisms to minimize these damages and they phagocytose the host immune cells to overcome the immune barrier. E. histolytica seems to have effective immune evasion strategies to overcome the adaptive immunity in the host. The different immunological factors involved during the interactions have been included in [Table 1].
Table 1: Major immunological components involved in the events during the infections due to Entamoeba histolytica

Click here to view


Trophozoite colonization

Apart from the absorptive role, gastrointestinal tract (GIT) regulates the immune response against the invading pathogens.[34] The existence of the parasite in the host requires interactions in favor of the parasite with the intestinal compartments, thus allowing its survival. IECs are the first to interact with the parasite antigens through a variety of pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs).[35] Upon binding to the ligand, these PRRs activate KFκB, a critical component for inflammatory IEC response. This recognition leads to the production of a sequence of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, IL-1 β, interferon-gamma, and TNF-α.[36],[37] These cytokines are known to have an array of activity against the invading trophozoites.[38],[39],[40] In this context, secretory amebic components are known to induce cytoprotective property in human intestinal epithelium.[41] Secreted components from E. histolytica trophozoites induce a protective stress response in human colonic epithelial cells by interaction with the macrophages that suppress activation of KFκB.[41] The host tolerance against the invading trophozoites is maintained using different host factors. IL-10 maintains the mucosal barrier integrity. An amebic colitis model had demonstrated that IL-10 deficient mice were highly susceptible to the intestinal invasion.[42] The host's anti-Gal lectin prevents trophozoites' adherence to mucous layer and epithelial cells. Studies have reported that intestinal anti-Gal-lectin immunoglobulin A (IgA) reduces the colonization of the trophozoites in the gut.[43] One of the studies had stated that participants with stool IgA recognizing Gal-lectin carbohydrate recognition domain were protected from new infections caused by E. histolytica.[44] In the absence of secretory IgA, the host may elicit a more robust inflammatory response, driving E. histolytica from commensal status to pathogen by increasing its ability to survive in high oxygen levels. EhCPs are known to cleave human IgA, thus protecting the parasite against host defences.

Invasion of colonic mucosa

The exact reason behind the invasion of E. histolytica is unknown. E. histolytica is known to synthesize and secrete PGE2, which disrupts IEC tight junctions.[25] Upon disruption of IEC junction, the parasite components are transferred to the basolateral surface of IEC. Invasion of colonic mucosa by trophozoites leads to acute inflammatory response and adaptive immunity.[43] The inflammation is believed to protect the host from invasive pathogens. However, it can also lead to severe tissue damage. In case of invasive intestinal infections, the initial inflammation is believed to exaggerate and drive further pathogenesis. The epithelial cells produce inflammatory cytokines like IL-1 β/α, IL-8, TNF-α, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 which results in the moderate epithelium and sub-epithelium inflammation.[45],[46] The recruitment of the neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages leads to diarrhea or dysentery in host. The T helper cell type 2 (Th2 cell) response from the host through IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, results in nonhealing intestinal lesions.[47] E. histolytica also expresses pore-forming protein, amoebapores, and hydrolytic enzymes such as cysteine proteases as weapons to penetrate host epithelium.[48],[49] After invasion of the colonic mucosa, trophozoites can also move to portal circulation leading to extra-intestinal manifestations such as abscesses of different vital organs, empyema, pericarditis, broncho-hepatic fistula, inferior vena cava thrombosis, and hemolytic uremic syndrome.

Extra-intestinal dissemination

The extra-intestinal dissemination of trophozoites through blood circulation requires ability to survive high oxygen concentration and protection against the host's immune system components. Intravascular immunity of the host may detect and kill trophozoites through complement system, anti-parasitic immunoglobulin G (IgG), and oxidative attack.[9],[50] However, if trophozoites survive, the innate response and adaptive Th2 response leads to the formation of ALA. EhCPs are known to inactivate the circulating IgG, resulting in decreased affinity of theantibodies for the antigens.[28] The “capping” of the surface receptors is another mechanism used by the trophozoites to avoid targeted immune responses. E. histolytica from liver abscesses and colitis patients show resistance to complement-mediated killing, which can be attributed to Gal-lectin and a 21 kDa surface protein.[51] The immune response in liver against the trophozoites is due to invariant natural killer T cells. Along with it, the detection of trophozoites in the liver can lead to acute inflammatory response resulting in the recruitment of massive number of neutrophils. As the lesion progresses, influx of macrophages occurs coinciding with the granuloma formation. Trophozoites aggregate at the inner walls of granulomas and lyse any cell they encounter. As the chronic stage of ALA progresses, macrophage and T-cell suppression occurs. In addition, defects in the cell-mediated immunity occur during the advanced chronic stage of ALA.[52]

Genes involved in the host-parasite interactions

The genome-based studies of E. histolytica have improved the knowledge of pathogenesis of E. histolytica regarding host-parasite interactions. Comparison of the virulent and nonvirulent strains along with the related species had shown the different genes involved in the pathogenesis. The different genes having a role in the events of host-parasite interactions during infections by E. histolytica have been shown in [Table 2].
Table 2: Different genes involved during the phases of infections due to Entamoeba. histolytica mentioned in the study

Click here to view


Mucus barrier degradation and binding to the host cells

A large number of genes are differentially expressed in the early phase of infection due to E. histolytica.[53] However, the exact role of many of these gene's product remains unexplored. It might be due to the stress response associated with the adaptation in the new environment. For the degradation of the mucus layer, the trophozoites release cysteine protease to degrade the main component of the mucus barrier, MUC2. Different genes from cysteine protease family such as CP-A4, CP-A6, and CP-B1 are expressed to a greater degree in culture as well as in the mouse intestine in experimental studies.[53] The trophozoites bind to the mucus layer of the host through Gal/GalNAc lectin complex. The genes encoding for the light subunit of the lectin complex (lgl2 and lgl3) shows downregulation during the course of the infection. Another E. histolytica gene family (EHI_012330, EHI_004340, and EHI_025700) codes for E. histolytica serine-, threonine-, and isoleucine-rich proteins involved in the binding of the trophozoites to the host cells.[54]

Survival strategies against the host responses

A number of genes show differential expression in response to the oxidative and nitrosative stress in pathogenic strain, HM1-IMSS, as compared to nonpathogenic E. histolytica strain, Rahman.[55] Peroxiredoxin gene and Fe-hydrogenase gene showed upregulation in the HM1-IMSS strain. Peroxiredoxin is expressed on the surface of the trophozoites as per the protein and mRNA expression study, where along with Gal/GalNAc lectin it degrades the ROS released from the immune cells.[56],[57] Upstream regulatory element 3 binding protein, a calcium-binding transcription factor, regulates the gene expression of E. histolytica virulence-associated genes.[58] Similarly, other genes such as superoxide dismutase, EhROM1 (a rhomboid protease), granin-1 and granin-2, alcohol dehydrogenase 3 have shown differential expression between the virulent and nonvirulent species as well as strains of Entamoeba pointing towards the role in virulence and survival of the parasite. The involvement of some other genes such as putative peroxiredoxin genes and putative oxidative stress response gene in host-parasite interactions has been seen. However, their exact functions remain unknown.

Amebic liver abscess formation

The transcriptome analysis of E. histolytica trophozoites axenically grown in vitro with the trophozoites isolated from the ALA showed differential expression of a number of genes including grainin-1, a guanosine triphosphate binding protein, a flavoprotein, and the ribosomal proteins.[59],[60] The virulent and avirulent lines derived from E. histolytica had shown upregulation of 29 genes and downregulation of 21 genes in the virulent strain. The upregulated genes and proteins included ariel-1, lysine and glutamic acid rich proteins, and lysine-rich proteins.

The comparison between cell lines capable of causing ALA and the one which has lost the ability to form ALA showed differential expression of 87 genes. However, only two genes Fe-hydrogenase-2 and a C2-domain-containing protein were differentially expressed at both transcriptomic and protein level.[61],[62] Antigen ariel-1 gene, lysine-rich proteins (“KRiPs”) and lysine-and glutamic acid-rich proteins (“KERPs”) have been found to be upregulated in the virulent strains.[63] Knock-down of KERP-1 gene has shown a reduction in the liver abscess forming ability of the trophozoites implying its significant role in the ALA formation.[64] Amoebapore-A gene when inserted into the host plasma membrane forms pores upon contact, lysing the host cells. But its crucial role in the ALA formation still needs to be clarified.[65]

Role of host haplotype in the severity of amoebiasis

It has been long known that not all individuals are equally susceptible to infections due to E. histolytica. Literature suggests that 1 out of 10 infected individuals develops invasive infection.[66] As E. histolytica lacks the sexual cycle of reproduction, thus, this partiality in the disease development cannot be attributed to only parasite genome.[67],[68] It has been advocated that hosts who carry susceptible alleles are more likely to get invasive infections. Different genome-wide association studies among the children and adults have been carried out to study about the role of genetic make-up of hosts in the susceptibility to invasive disease development.[69],[70]

An association between the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II allele and the symptomatic infections due to E. histolytica has been reported from an endemic region. Particularly, HLA class II allele DQB1 × 0601 and the heterozygous haplotype DQB1 × 0601/DRB1 × 1501 had shown drastically decreased frequency of infections due to E. histolytica in comparison to the individuals lacking this haplotype.[71] Similarly, a study from Mexico showed HLA-DQB1 × 02 allele was found with higher frequency in patients suffering from ALA as compared to the healthy controls. The haplotype HLA-DRB1 × 08/-DQB1 × 04 was reported in less frequency in patients with infections due to E. histolytica than in healthy individuals.[72],[73] The reason for such a partial behavior could be that the presence or absence of a certain HLA class II allele could vary the repertoire of proteins presented to the CD4+ T cells.[71]

Earlier studies have documented an association of the HLA class II to ALA but not with the intestinal infections due to E. histolytica.[74] A study of the Mexican adults and children has reported an increased frequency of the HLA-DR3 in the patients with ALA as compared to the healthy control subjects irrespective of age or sex. Among the children suffering from ALA, increased frequency of HLA-DR5 and the absence of HLA-DR6 has been reported in comparison to adults with ALA.[75]

At the same time, certain studies have also shown the involvement of the non-HLA host gene in the susceptibility to infections by E. histolytica. Direct correlation between the host genetic marker and the susceptibility to E. histolytica infection was described for a polymorphism in the leptin receptor gene.[69] A study from an endemic region had shown that single amino acid replacement (Q223R) in the leptin receptor's extracellular domain encoded by a single nucleotide polymorphism resulted in four-fold increase in the susceptibility of the individual to the infections by E. histolytica.[76] An association between the anti-amebic IgA and IgG responses to the susceptibility and resistance to the infections due to E. histolytica has also been documented.[71] Genetic variation in a transcriptional regulator, cAMP-responsive element modulator/cullin 2 locus of the host has been found to be associated with the diarrheal infections due to E. histolytica.[70]

Role of microbiota at mucosal interfaces

The GIT of humans is home to at least 400 different species of bacteria.[77] The development of the microbial community starts since birth and evolves influencing the local environment significantly. E. histolytica is found on the lumen of large intestine, which is the site of largest bacterial population in humans. The virulence of E. histolytica against the host has been shown to be significantly enhance by intestinal bacterial population in microbiota-controlled animal models.[78],[79] Studies suggest that the resident microbiota plays a crucial role at the mucosal interfaces in the transmission of the parasitic protozoans and onset of the disease. The microflora has been known to greatly influence the central energy metabolism of the trophozoites.[9]

Certain species of the bacteria such as  Escherichia More Details coli, Shigella dysenteriae, and Staphylococcus aureus promote critical changes in the host response and E. histolytica interactions.[80] Studies have also found the presence of Prevotella sp. in abscess fluid to be significantly associated with the recurrence of ALA.[30] The E. coli serotype O55 has been known to bind strongly with the Gal/GalNAc lectin of E. histolytica. It is attributed to the presence of surface carbohydrate components rich in Gal and N-acetyl galactosamine on the bacterial strain. This event enhances the virulence of E. histolytica in the first hour.[81],[82] In addition, these bacterial population also affects the host responses related to the epithelial barrier functions, chemoattraction of neutrophils, and inflammatory response.[37],[83] The synergistic effects of intestinal bacteria on the host and parasite responses make the surrounding environment more permissible for the parasite invasion and the progression of the disease. It may be possible that microbiota affects the host immune response also in the case of E. histolytica infection similar to that of rheumatoid arthritis, obesity, diabetes, and cancer.[84],[85],[86],[87] The microbiota-mediated immunomodulation can be a potential factor in the E. histolytica disease establishment. Studies have reported that the germ-free animals showed resistance to infection caused by E. histolytica, supporting the potential role of the microflora in the establishment of the infection. However, the critical analysis of the various role of the associated microflora on the virulence and survival of the Entamoeba in the host needs to be finely explored.


   Conclusion Top


The study of parasite interactions and host response is challenging in case of human diseases. However, for the study of the host and parasite interactions in the case of E. histolytica infections different animal models such as hamsters, gerbil, or severe combined immunodeficiency diseased mouse are available. The understanding of the different aspects of E. histolytica pathogenesis such as adherence, invasion, degradation of mucin and extracellular matrix, extra-intestinal dissemination has greatly advanced in the recent times. However, the different interactions responsible for switching of Entamoeba from commensal to pathogen status needs to be thoroughly explored. In addition, the reason behind the partiality in virulence leading to intestinal symptoms in some and extra-intestinal invasion in others needs to be evaluated. The role of the microbiota, along with the variety of genes showing differential expressions and different immunological factors needs to be described. The broad spectrum of relationship, i.e., host-parasite-microbiota should be considered instead of host-parasite interactions for proper understanding of the progression of disease in natural situations.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Banaras Hindu University and Department of Science and Technology, India, for providing facility to conduct this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
World Health Organization. The World Health Report. Life in the 21st Century: A Vision for All. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1998.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Stark D, Fotedar R, van Hal S, Beebe N, Marriott D, Ellis JT, et al. Prevalence of enteric protozoa in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive and HIV-negative men who have sex with men from Sydney, Australia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2007;76:549-52.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Stark D, van Hal SJ, Matthews G, Harkness J, Marriott D. Invasive amebiasis in men who have sex with men, Australia. Emerg Infect Dis 2008;14:1141-3.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Rivera WL, Santos SR, Kanbara H. Prevalence and genetic diversity of Entamoeba histolytica in an institution for the mentally retarded in the Philippines. Parasitol Res 2006;98:106-10.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Nishise S, Fujishima T, Kobayashi S, Otani K, Nishise Y, Takeda H, et al. Mass infection with Entamoeba histolytica in a Japanese institution for individuals with mental retardation: Epidemiology and control measures. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2010;104:383-90.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ximénez C, Cerritos R, Rojas L, Dolabella S, Morán P, Shibayama M, et al. Human amebiasis: Breaking the paradigm? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2010;7:1105-20.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Espinosa-Cantellano M, Martínez-Palomo A. Pathogenesis of intestinal amebiasis: From molecules to disease. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000;13:318-31.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Petri WA Jr., Haque R, Mann BJ. The bittersweet interface of parasite and host: Lectin-carbohydrate interactions during human invasion by the parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Annu Rev Microbiol 2002;56:39-64.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Nakada-Tsukui K, Nozaki T. Immune response of amebiasis and immune evasion by Entamoeba histolytica. Front Immunol 2016;7:175.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Herrmann A, Davies JR, Lindell G, Mårtensson S, Packer NH, Swallow DM, et al. Studies on the “insoluble” glycoprotein complex from human colon. Identification of reduction-insensitive MUC2 oligomers and C-terminal cleavage. J Biol Chem 1999;274:15828-36.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Cornick S, Chadee K. Entamoeba histolytica: Host parasite interactions at the colonic epithelium. Tissue Barriers 2017;5:e1283386.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Dodson JM, Lenkowski PW Jr., Eubanks AC, Jackson TF, Napodano J, Lyerly DM, et al. Infection and immunity mediated by the carbohydrate recognition domain of the Entamoeba histolytica Gal/GalNAc lectin. J Infect Dis 1999;179:460-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Ravdin JI, Sperelakis N, Guerrant RL. Effect of ion channel inhibitors on the cytopathogenicity of Entamoeba histolytica. J Infect Dis 1982;146:335-40.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Ravdin JI, Murphy CF, Guerrant RL, Long-Krug SA. Effect of antagonists of calcium and phospholipase A on the cytopathogenicity of Entamoeba histolytica. J Infect Dis 1985;152:542-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Frederick JR, Petri WA Jr. Roles for the galactose-/N-acetylgalactosamine-binding lectin of Entamoeba in parasite virulence and differentiation. Glycobiology 2005;15:53R-9R.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Moncada D, Keller K, Chadee K. Entamoeba histolytica-secreted products degrade colonic mucin oligosaccharides. Infect Immun 2005;73:3790-3.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Thibeaux R, Weber C, Hon CC, Dillies MA, Avé P, Coppée JY, et al. Identification of the virulence landscape essential for Entamoeba histolytica invasion of the human colon. PLoS Pathog 2013;9:e1003824.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Moncada D, Keller K, Ankri S, Mirelman D, Chadee K. Antisense inhibition of Entamoeba histolytica cysteine proteases inhibits colonic mucus degradation. Gastroenterology 2006;130:721-30.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Faust DM, Guillen N. Cell-surface molecules as virulence determinants in Entamoeba histolytica. In: Amebiasis. Tokyo: Springer; 2015. p. 243-62.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Seydel KB, Li E, Zhang Z, Stanley SL Jr. Epithelial cell-initiated inflammation plays a crucial role in early tissue damage in amebic infection of human intestine. Gastroenterology 1998;115:1446-53.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Silvestre A, Plaze A, Berthon P, Thibeaux R, Guillen N, Labruyère E. In Entamoeba histolytica, a BspA family protein is required for chemotaxis toward tumour necrosis factor. Microb Cell 2015;2:235-46.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
López-Rosas I, López-Camarillo C, Salinas-Vera YM, Hernández-de la Cruz ON, Palma-Flores C, Chávez-Munguía B, et al. Entamoeba histolytica up-regulates MicroRNA-643 to promote apoptosis by targeting XIAP in human epithelial colon cells. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2018;8:437.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Paul S, Ruiz-Manriquez LM, Serrano-Cano FI, Estrada-Meza C, Solorio-Diaz KA, Srivastava A. Human microRNAs in host-parasite interaction: A review. 3 Biotech 2020;10:510.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Leroy A, Lauwaet T, De Bruyne G, Cornelissen M, Mareel M. Entamoeba histolytica disturbs the tight junction complex in human enteric T84 cell layers. FASEB J 2000;14:1139-46.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Lejeune M, Moreau F, Chadee K. Prostaglandin E2 produced by Entamoeba histolytica signals via EP4 receptor and alters claudin-4 to increase ion permeability of tight junctions. Am J Pathol 2011;179:807-18.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Parija SC, Khairnar K. Detection of excretory Entamoeba histolytica DNA in the urine, and detection of E. histolytica DNA and lectin antigen in the liver abscess pus for the diagnosis of amoebic liver abscess. BMC Microbiol 2007;7:41.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Leroy A, Mareel M, De Bruyne G, Bailey G, Nelis H. Metastasis of Entamoeba histolytica compared to colon cancer: One more step in invasion. Invasion Metastasis 1994;14:177-91.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Que X, Reed SL. Cysteine proteinases and the pathogenesis of amebiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000;13:196-206.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Thibeaux R, Avé P, Bernier M, Morcelet M, Frileux P, Guillén N, et al. The parasite Entamoeba histolytica exploits the activities of human matrix metalloproteinases to invade colonic tissue. Nat Commun 2014;5:5142.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Singh A, Banerjee T, Shukla SK. Factors associated with high rates of recurrence of amebic liver abscess (ALA) in North India. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2021;104:1383-7.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Tillack M, Biller L, Irmer H, Freitas M, Gomes MA, Tannich E, et al. The Entamoeba histolytica genome: Primary structure and expression of proteolytic enzymes. BMC Genomics 2007;8:170.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Jackson-Akers JY, Prakash V, Oliver TI. Amebic liver abscess. Treasure Island (FL), United States: StatPearls; 2021.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Lin JY, Chadee K. Macrophage cytotoxicity against Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites is mediated by nitric oxide from L-arginine. J Immunol 1992;148:3999-4005.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Artis D. Epithelial-cell recognition of commensal bacteria and maintenance of immune homeostasis in the gut. Nat Rev Immunol 2008;8:411-20.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Kumar H, Kawai T, Akira S. Pathogen recognition by the innate immune system. Int Rev Immunol 2011;30:16-34.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Gay NJ, Gangloff M. Structure and function of Toll receptors and their ligands. Annu Rev Biochem 2007;76:141-65.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Galván-Moroyoqui JM, Del Carmen Domínguez-Robles M, Meza I. Pathogenic bacteria prime the induction of Toll-like receptor signalling in human colonic cells by the Gal/GalNAc lectin carbohydrate recognition domain of Entamoeba histolytica. Int J Parasitol 2011;41:1101-12.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Helk E, Bernin H, Ernst T, Ittrich H, Jacobs T, Heeren J, et al. TNFα-mediated liver destruction by Kupffer cells and Ly6Chi monocytes during Entamoeba histolytica infection. PLoS Pathog 2013;9:e1003096.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Haque R, Mondal D, Shu J, Roy S, Kabir M, Davis AN, et al. Correlation of interferon-gamma production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells with childhood malnutrition and susceptibility to amebiasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2007;76:340-4.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Guo X, Barroso L, Becker SM, Lyerly DM, Vedvick TS, Reed SG, et al. Protection against intestinal amebiasis by a recombinant vaccine is transferable by T cells and mediated by gamma interferon. Infect Immun 2009;77:3909-18.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Kammanadiminti SJ, Chadee K. Suppression of NF-κB activation by Entamoeba histolytica in intestinal epithelial cells is mediated by heat shock protein 27. J Biol Chem 2006;281:26112-20.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Madsen KL, Malfair D, Gray D, Doyle JS, Jewell LD, Fedorak RN. Interleukin-10 gene-deficient mice develop a primary intestinal permeability defect in response to enteric microflora. Inflamm Bowel Dis 1999;5:262-70.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Mortimer L, Chadee K. The immunopathogenesis of Entamoeba histolytica. Exp Parasitol 2010;126:366-80.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Haque R, Ali IM, Sack RB, Farr BM, Ramakrishnan G, Petri WA Jr. Amebiasis and mucosal IgA antibody against the Entamoeba histolytica adherence lectin in Bangladeshi children. J Infect Dis 2001;183:1787-93.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Séguin R, Mann BJ, Keller K, Chadee K. Identification of the galactose-adherence lectin epitopes of Entamoeba histolytica that stimulate tumor necrosis factor-alpha production by macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995;92:12175-9.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Kammanadiminti SJ, Mann BJ, Dutil L, Chadee K. Regulation of Toll-like receptor-2 expression by the Gal-lectin of Entamoeba histolytica. FASEB J 2004;18:155-7.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Guo X, Stroup SE, Houpt ER. Persistence of Entamoeba histolytica infection in CBA mice owes to intestinal IL-4 production and inhibition of protective IFN-gamma. Mucosal Immunol 2008;1:139-46.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Leippe M. Amoebapores. Parasitol Today 1997;13:178-83.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Schulte W, Scholze H. Action of the major protease from Entamoeba histolytica on proteins of the extracellular matrix. J Protozool 1989;36:538-43.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Kaur U, Sharma AK, Sharma M, Vohra H. Distribution of Entamoeba histolytica Gal/GalNAc lectin-specific antibody response in an endemic area. Scand J Immunol 2004;60:524-8.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Aguirre García M, Gutiérrez-Kobeh L, López Vancell R. Entamoeba histolytica: Adhesins and lectins in the trophozoite surface. Molecules 2015;20:2802-15.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Campbell D, Gaucher D, Chadee K. Serum from Entamoeba histolytica-infected gerbils selectively suppresses T cell proliferation by inhibiting interleukin-2 production. J Infect Dis 1999;179:1495-501.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Gilchrist CA, Houpt E, Trapaidze N, Fei Z, Crasta O, Asgharpour A, et al. Impact of intestinal colonization and invasion on the Entamoeba histolytica transcriptome. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2006;147:163-76.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
MacFarlane RC, Singh U. Identification of an Entamoeba histolytica serine-, threonine-, and isoleucine-rich protein with roles in adhesion and cytotoxicity. Eukaryot Cell 2007;6:2139-46.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Vicente JB, Ehrenkaufer GM, Saraiva LM, Teixeira M, Singh U. Entamoeba histolytica modulates a complex repertoire of novel genes in response to oxidative and nitrosative stresses: Implications for amebic pathogenesis. Cell Microbiol 2009;11:51-69.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Davis PH, Zhang X, Guo J, Townsend RR, Stanley SL Jr. Comparative proteomic analysis of two Entamoeba histolytica strains with different virulence phenotypes identifies peroxiredoxin as an important component of amoebic virulence. Mol Microbiol 2006;61:1523-32.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
MacFarlane RC, Singh U. Identification of differentially expressed genes in virulent and nonvirulent Entamoeba species: Potential implications for amebic pathogenesis. Infect Immun 2006;74:340-51.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Gilchrist CA, Moore ES, Zhang Y, Bousquet CB, Lannigan JA, Mann BJ, et al. Regulation of virulence of Entamoeba histolytica by the URE3-BP transcription factor. mBio 2010;1:e00057-10.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Espinosa-Cantellano M, Martínez-Palomo A. Entamoeba histolytica: Mechanism of surface receptor capping. Exp Parasitol 1994;79:424-35.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
Bruchhaus I, Roeder T, Lotter H, Schwerdtfeger M, Tannich E. Differential gene expression in Entamoeba histolytica isolated from amoebic liver abscess. Mol Microbiol 2002;44:1063-72.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.
Biller L, Davis PH, Tillack M, Matthiesen J, Lotter H, Stanley SL Jr., et al. Differences in the transcriptome signatures of two genetically related Entamoeba histolytica cell lines derived from the same isolate with different pathogenic properties. BMC Genomics 2010;11:63.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.
Biller L, Schmidt H, Krause E, Gelhaus C, Matthiesen J, Handal G, et al. Comparison of two genetically related Entamoeba histolytica cell lines derived from the same isolate with different pathogenic properties. Proteomics 2009;9:4107-20.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.
Willhoeft U, Buss H, Tannich E. DNA sequences corresponding to the ariel gene family of Entamoeba histolytica are not present in E. dispar. Parasitol Res 1999;85:787-9.  Back to cited text no. 63
    
64.
Santi-Rocca J, Weber C, Guigon G, Sismeiro O, Coppée JY, Guillén N. The lysine- and glutamic acid-rich protein KERP1 plays a role in Entamoeba histolytica liver abscess pathogenesis. Cell Microbiol 2008;10:202-17.  Back to cited text no. 64
    
65.
Lynch EC, Rosenberg IM, Gitler C. An ion-channel forming protein produced by Entamoeba histolytica. EMBO J 1982;1:801-4.  Back to cited text no. 65
    
66.
Stauffer W, Ravdin JI. Entamoeba histolytica: An update. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2003;16:479-85.  Back to cited text no. 66
    
67.
Beck DL, Tanyuksel M, Mackey AJ, Haque R, Trapaidze N, Pearson WR, et al. Entamoeba histolytica: Sequence conservation of the Gal/GalNAc lectin from clinical isolates. Exp Parasitol 2002;101:157-63.  Back to cited text no. 67
    
68.
Ghosh S, Frisardi M, Ramirez-Avila L, Descoteaux S, Sturm-Ramirez K, Newton-Sanchez OA, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Entamoeba spp.: Evidence of a bottleneck (Demographic sweep) and transcontinental spread of diploid parasites. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:3815-21.  Back to cited text no. 68
    
69.
Duggal P, Guo X, Haque R, Peterson KM, Ricklefs S, Mondal D, et al. A mutation in the leptin receptor is associated with Entamoeba histolytica infection in children. J Clin Invest 2011;121:1191-8.  Back to cited text no. 69
    
70.
Wojcik GL, Marie C, Abhyankar MM, Yoshida N, Watanabe K, Mentzer AJ, et al. Genome-Wide association study reveals genetic link between Diarrhea-associated Entamoeba histolytica infection and inflammatory Bowel disease. mBio 2018;9:e01668-18.  Back to cited text no. 70
    
71.
Duggal P, Haque R, Roy S, Mondal D, Sack RB, Farr BM, et al. Influence of human leukocyte antigen class II alleles on susceptibility to Entamoeba histolytica infection in Bangladeshi children. J Infect Dis 2004;189:520-6.  Back to cited text no. 71
    
72.
Hernández EG, Granados J, Partida-Rodríguez O, Valenzuela O, Rascón E, Magaña U, et al. Prevalent HLA class II alleles in Mexico city appear to confer resistance to the development of amebic liver abscess. PLoS One 2015;10:e0126195.  Back to cited text no. 72
    
73.
Valdez E, del Carmen Martínez M, Gómez A, Cedillo R, Arellano J, Pérez ME, et al. HLA characterization in adult asymptomatic cyst passers of Entamoeba histolytica/E. dispar. Parasitol Res 1999;85:833-6.  Back to cited text no. 73
    
74.
Arellano J, Granados J, Pérez E, Félix C, Kretschmer RR. Increased frequency of HLA-DR3 and complotype SC01 in Mexican mestizo patients with amoebic abscess of the liver. Parasite Immunol 1991;13:23-9.  Back to cited text no. 74
    
75.
Arellano J, Peŕez-Rodríguez M, López-Osuna M, Velázquez JR, Granados J, Justiniani N, et al. Increased frequency of HLA-DR3 and complotype SCO1 in Mexican mestizo children with amoebic abscess of the liver. Parasite Immunol 1996;18:491-8.  Back to cited text no. 75
    
76.
Mackey-Lawrence NM, Guo X, Sturdevant DE, Virtaneva K, Hernandez MM, Houpt E, et al. Effect of the leptin receptor Q223R polymorphism on the host transcriptome following infection with Entamoeba histolytica. Infect Immun 2013;81:1460-70.  Back to cited text no. 76
    
77.
Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Bernstein CN, Purdom E, Dethlefsen L, Sargent M, et al. Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science 2005;308:1635-8.  Back to cited text no. 77
    
78.
Phillips BP, Wolfe PA, Rees CW, Gordon HA, Wright WH, Reyniers JA. Studies on the ameba-bacteria relationship in amebiasis; comparative results of the intracecal inoculation of germfree, monocontaminated, and conventional guinea pigs with Entamoeba histolytica. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1955;4:675-92.  Back to cited text no. 78
    
79.
Phillips BP, Wolfe PA. The use of germfree guinea pigs in studies on the microbial interrelationships in amoebiasis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1959;78:308-14.  Back to cited text no. 79
    
80.
Marie C, Petri WA Jr. Regulation of virulence of Entamoeba histolytica. Annu Rev Microbiol 2014;68:493-520.  Back to cited text no. 80
    
81.
Mendoza-Macías CL, Barrios-Ceballos MP, de la Peña LP, Rangel-Serrano A, Anaya-Velázquez F, Mirelman D, et al. Entamoeba histolytica: Effect on virulence, growth and gene expression in response to monoxenic culture with Escherichia coli 055. Exp Parasitol 2009;121:167-74.  Back to cited text no. 81
    
82.
Padilla-Vaca F, Ankri S, Bracha R, Koole LA, Mirelman D. Down regulation of Entamoeba histolytica virulence by monoxenic cultivation with Escherichia coli O55 is related to a decrease in expression of the light (35-kilodalton) subunit of the Gal/GalNAc lectin. Infect Immun 1999;67:2096-102.  Back to cited text no. 82
    
83.
Galván-Moroyoqui JM, Del Carmen Domínguez-Robles M, Franco E, Meza I. The interplay between Entamoeba and enteropathogenic bacteria modulates epithelial cell damage. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2008;2:e266.  Back to cited text no. 83
    
84.
Scher JU, Abramson SB. The microbiome and rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2011;7:569-78.  Back to cited text no. 84
    
85.
Romano-Keeler J, Weitkamp JH, Moore DJ. Regulatory properties of the intestinal microbiome effecting the development and treatment of diabetes. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2012;19:73-80.  Back to cited text no. 85
    
86.
Jin C, Henao-Mejia J, Flavell RA. Innate immune receptors: Key regulators of metabolic disease progression. Cell Metab 2013;17:873-82.  Back to cited text no. 86
    
87.
Erdman SE, Poutahidis T. Gut bacteria and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 2015;1856:86-90.  Back to cited text no. 87
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Survey Methodology
    Events During Ho...
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed529    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded7    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal